Arc A550M vs RTX A4500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
45.26
+84.7%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms Arc A550M by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.3828.28
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA104DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58882048
Core clock speed930 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate276.0262.4
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs184128
Tensor Cores184256
Ray Tracing Cores4616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1288%
110−120
+1288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−261%
100−110
+261%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1288%
110−120
+1288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−261%
100−110
+261%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1288%
110−120
+1288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−261%
100−110
+261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Hitman 3 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 12−14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A550M is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.26 24.51
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 84.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 74 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.