GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs RTX A2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.77no data
Power efficiency35.42no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA106GB203
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332810752
Core clock speed562 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8672.0
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS43.01 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs104336
Tensor Cores104336
Ray Tracing Cores2684

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.610.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 175 Watt

RTX A2000 has 150% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 567 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.