Arc A730M vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc A730M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
53.61
+51.9%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking41135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceXe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameDG2-512Alchemist
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (1 year ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed930 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data211.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc A730M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 53.61
+51.9%
Arc A730M 35.30

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+77.6%
Arc A730M 29144

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 78% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+42.9%
Arc A730M 21294

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 43% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+38.9%
72
−38.9%
1440p65−70
+51.2%
43
−51.2%
4K35−40
+40%
25
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+40.8%
71
−40.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+48.4%
64
−48.4%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+49.1%
110−120
−49.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+38.9%
70−75
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+48.4%
64
−48.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+41%
75−80
−41%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+46.1%
85−90
−46.1%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.1%
130−140
−51.1%
Hitman 3 75−80
+47.1%
51
−47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+50.3%
153
−50.3%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+42.9%
100−110
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+47.7%
85−90
−47.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 270−280
+51.7%
178
−51.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+41.2%
85
−41.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+48.1%
54
−48.1%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+49.1%
110−120
−49.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+38.9%
70−75
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+48.1%
54
−48.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+41%
75−80
−41%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+46.1%
85−90
−46.1%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.1%
130−140
−51.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+45.8%
24
−45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+47.9%
140−150
−47.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+46.3%
41
−46.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+47.7%
85−90
−47.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+47.7%
149
−47.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+45.5%
110
−45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+44.4%
90−95
−44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+45.8%
48
−45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+38.9%
70−75
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+44.2%
52
−44.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+41%
75−80
−41%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.1%
130−140
−51.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+47.7%
88
−47.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
+45.2%
124
−45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+44.4%
45
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+45.8%
48
−45.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+47.7%
85−90
−47.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+48.1%
80−85
−48.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+44.7%
35−40
−44.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+48.6%
37
−48.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+44.2%
50−55
−44.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+45.2%
31
−45.2%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+50.7%
70−75
−50.7%
Hitman 3 55−60
+41%
39
−41%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+51.5%
66
−51.5%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+42.9%
80−85
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+42.9%
35
−42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+50%
60−65
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Hitman 3 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+47.7%
40−45
−47.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+42.9%
28
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+50%
40
−50%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+41%
39
−41%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 39% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 51% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.61 35.30
Recency 12 October 2022 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 120 Watt

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A730M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 107 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.