Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Qualcomm Adreno 685
2018
2.68

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 325% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking772385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.67no data
Architectureno dataGen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameno dataiDG1LPDEV
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)31 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data79.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4266 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.68
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 11.40
+325%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 325% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 892
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971
+121%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 121% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214
+326%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 326% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−350%
27
+350%
1440p4−5
−400%
20
+400%
4K3−4
−433%
16
+433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−660%
38
+660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−550%
26
+550%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Hitman 3 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−350%
27
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−156%
23
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−525%
25
+525%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−633%
22
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
28
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−467%
34
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−500%
24
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−200%
18
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Hitman 3 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 350% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 400% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 2000% faster than the Qualcomm Adreno 685.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Iris Xe MAX Graphics surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 685 in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.68 11.40
Recency 6 December 2018 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 25 Watt

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 14 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 222 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.