UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in the ranking	867	748
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.84	8.68
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	no data	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	32
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	12-25 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.11

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.14
+48.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
4K	6−7 −50%	9 +50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +9.1%	11 −9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −8.3%	13 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +180%	5 −180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 63% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 180% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games: