UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in performance ranking	764	730
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	no data	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)	28 May 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	32
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	12-25 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.74

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.04
+10.9%

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127
+9.9%

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 10% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −30%	13 +30%
4K	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −100%	8 +100%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −33.3%	8 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −16.7%	7 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +28.6%	7 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +40%	5 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 30% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 100% faster than the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).
in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 167% faster than the Qualcomm Adreno 680.

All in all, in popular games: