GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	248	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.69	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	N19P-Q3	GN21-X9
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$2221	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	7424
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1860 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2280 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	114.2	386.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.63

RTX 4080 Mobile 52.40
+154%

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 154% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524

RTX 4080 Mobile 57598
+326%

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 326% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 −173%	164 +173%
1440p	40−45 −183%	113 +183%
4K	27−30 −167%	72 +167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−352%

149
+352%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −153%	90−95 +153%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −97.1%	130−140 +97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −163%	140−150 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −333%	143 +333%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −224%	175 +224%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −113%	150−160 +113%
Hitman 3	60−65 −178%	160−170 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −159%	110−120 +159%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −150%	85−90 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −357%	201 +357%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −223%	129 +223%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −153%	90−95 +153%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −97.1%	130−140 +97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −163%	140−150 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −276%	124 +276%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −193%	158 +193%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −113%	150−160 +113%
Hitman 3	60−65 −178%	160−170 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −29.5%	57 +29.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −342%	146 +342%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −150%	85−90 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −323%	186 +323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −642%	334 +642%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −203%	121 +203%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −228%	118 +228%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −97.1%	130−140 +97.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −267%	121 +267%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −176%	149 +176%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −113%	150−160 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −282%	172 +282%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −175%	110 +175%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −197%	90−95 +197%
Hitman 3	30−35 −221%	100−110 +221%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −293%	106 +293%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −410%	102 +410%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −200%	45−50 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −430%	143 +430%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −159%	55−60 +159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −389%	93 +389%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −124%	100−110 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −583%	82 +583%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −269%	129 +269%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −135%	90−95 +135%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −171%	110−120 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −496%	137 +496%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −520%	93 +520%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −253%	50−55 +253%
Hitman 3	18−20 −205%	55−60 +205%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −469%	74 +469%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −458%	67 +458%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −500%	84 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −448%	115 +448%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −400%	55 +400%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −388%	83 +388%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −195%	55−60 +195%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −162%	75−80 +162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −522%	56 +522%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 Mobile is 173% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1080p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 183% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1440p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 167% faster than T2000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 875% faster than the T2000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4080 Mobile surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.63	52.40
Recency	27 May 2019	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	150 Watt