GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	249	120
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.85	19.38
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19P-Q3	N18E-G2R
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$2221	$1443

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has 300% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	114.2	220.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	14002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.67

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 36.48
+76.5%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 29093
+115%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 115% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65−70 −86.2%	121 +86.2%
1440p	40−45 −97.5%	79 +97.5%
4K	24−27 −87.5%	45 +87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−80%

60−65
+80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −89.1%	104 +89.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −84.4%	83 +84.4%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −76.9%	115 +76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −82.5%	146 +82.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −80%	162 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −77.5%	140−150 +77.5%
Hitman 3	55−60 −90.9%	105 +90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −76.8%	168 +76.8%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −80%	144 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −83.1%	119 +83.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −85.3%	130−140 +85.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −89.1%	104 +89.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −80%	90 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −77.5%	71 +77.5%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −83.6%	101 +83.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −83.1%	119 +83.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −86.7%	112 +86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −77.5%	140−150 +77.5%
Hitman 3	27−30 −92.6%	52 +92.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −83.8%	140−150 +83.8%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −77.1%	124 +77.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −90%	114 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −85.3%	130−140 +85.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −81.1%	163 +81.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −84%	90−95 +84%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	63 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −103%	61 +103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −87.5%	75 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −84.4%	83 +84.4%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −77.5%	140−150 +77.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −86.2%	121 +86.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −85.3%	130−140 +85.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −93.3%	87 +93.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −103%	61 +103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−80%

108

+80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −100%	70−75 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −86.2%	121 +86.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −86.7%	56 +86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −100%	70 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −100%	27−30 +100%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −88.6%	65−70 +88.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −87.5%	75−80 +87.5%
Hitman 3	30−33 −103%	61 +103%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −95%	75−80 +95%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −78%	89 +78%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −93.3%	85−90 +93.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −92.6%	50−55 +92.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −83.3%	44 +83.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−86.7%

84
+86.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −100%	35−40 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −95.2%	41 +95.2%
Hitman 3	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −106%	37 +106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −100%	36 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −77.8%	32 +77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −93.8%	31 +93.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −85.2%	50 +85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −78.6%	25 +78.6%