GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.72

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms T2000 Mobile by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.6730.44
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1575 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2184.8
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.72
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.52
+71.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Mobile 7985
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13689
+71.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Mobile 13524
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 27724
+105%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−75%
105
+75%
1440p40−45
−75%
70
+75%
4K27−30
−74.1%
47
+74.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.9%
60−65
+87.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−115%
99
+115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−131%
81
+131%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−69.1%
110−120
+69.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−140%
101
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.9%
60−65
+87.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−165%
127
+165%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−149%
137
+149%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−43.3%
180−190
+43.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
−151%
103
+151%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−53.5%
150−160
+53.5%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−103%
144
+103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−98.2%
109
+98.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−85.5%
120−130
+85.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−32.3%
120−130
+32.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−65.2%
75−80
+65.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−100%
70
+100%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−69.1%
110−120
+69.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−117%
91
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.9%
60−65
+87.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−125%
108
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−76.4%
97
+76.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−43.3%
180−190
+43.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
−149%
102
+149%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−53.5%
150−160
+53.5%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−100%
142
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−65.5%
91
+65.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−85.5%
120−130
+85.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−60.9%
70−75
+60.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−32.3%
120−130
+32.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−34.8%
62
+34.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−71.4%
60
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−61.9%
68
+61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−87.9%
60−65
+87.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−58.3%
76
+58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−43.3%
180−190
+43.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
−110%
86
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−5.1%
104
+5.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−85.5%
120−130
+85.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−63%
75
+63%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+57.6%
59
−57.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70%
65−70
+70%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−100%
64
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−124%
47
+124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−117%
50
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−125%
54
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−75%
200−210
+75%
Hitman 3 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−83.3%
75−80
+83.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−92.3%
75
+92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−97.7%
85−90
+97.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−49.6%
180−190
+49.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−109%
71
+109%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−119%
35
+119%
Hitman 3 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−59.8%
170−180
+59.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−177%
61
+177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−143%
51
+143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−167%
32
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−164%
29
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−155%
28
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−75%
45−50
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−100%
45−50
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−100%
36
+100%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 75% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 74% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 58% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 177% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.72 35.52
Recency 27 May 2019 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 80 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 393 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 504 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.