GeForce MX570 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	300	330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.14	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	GN20-S5
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price	$1890	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2048
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.84	73.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.90
+13.4%

GeForce MX570 14.90

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms GeForce MX570 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Mobile 6540
+13.5%

GeForce MX570 5764

Quadro T1000 Mobile outperforms GeForce MX570 by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 +16.4%	55−60 −16.4%
4K	48 +20%	40−45 −20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+13%

21−24

−13%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +54.8%	30−35 −54.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +16%	24−27 −16%
Battlefield 5	60 +17.6%	50−55 −17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	61 +60.5%	35−40 −60.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Far Cry 5	62 +59%	35−40 −59%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 +17.1%	40−45 −17.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +13.5%	50−55 −13.5%
Hitman 3	45−50 +14.6%	40−45 −14.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	47 +88%	24−27 −88%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +83.9%	30−35 −83.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +14.3%	27−30 −14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +38.7%	30−35 −38.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +16%	24−27 −16%
Battlefield 5	52 +2%	50−55 −2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +23.7%	35−40 −23.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Far Cry 5	57 +46.2%	35−40 −46.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +12.2%	40−45 −12.2%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +13.5%	50−55 −13.5%
Hitman 3	45−50 +14.6%	40−45 −14.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Metro Exodus	34 +47.8%	21−24 −47.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	48 +54.8%	30−35 −54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +103%	30−35 −103%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +14.3%	27−30 −14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +16%	24−27 −16%
Battlefield 5	47 −8.5%	50−55 +8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Far Cry 5	53 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	43 +4.9%	40−45 −4.9%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +13.5%	50−55 −13.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +12.9%	30−35 −12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +14.3%	27−30 −14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +13.6%	21−24 −13.6%
Hitman 3	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +13.8%	27−30 −13.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Hitman 3	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

This is how T1000 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

T1000 Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
T1000 Mobile is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 103% faster than the GeForce MX570.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 9% faster than the T1000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

T1000 Mobile is ahead in 65 tests (96%)
GeForce MX570 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.90	14.90
Recency	27 May 2019	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt