GeForce MX570 vs Quadro T500 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
9.00

MX570 outperforms T500 Mobile by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T500 Mobile Quadro T500
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.3440.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speed1365 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate94.9273.92
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs5664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−5.6%
38
+5.6%
1440p15
−60%
24−27
+60%
4K17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Far Cry 5 30
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Fortnite 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−81%
35−40
+81%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−70%
50−55
+70%
Valorant 80−85
−39.3%
110−120
+39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−43.9%
190−200
+43.9%
Dota 2 90
+1.1%
85−90
−1.1%
Far Cry 5 28
−67.9%
45−50
+67.9%
Fortnite 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−81%
35−40
+81%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−74.2%
54
+74.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−70%
50−55
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%
Valorant 80−85
−39.3%
110−120
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Dota 2 75
−18.7%
85−90
+18.7%
Far Cry 5 27
−74.1%
45−50
+74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−70%
50−55
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−78.9%
34
+78.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−54.9%
75−80
+54.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−60%
100−110
+60%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 95−100
−52.6%
140−150
+52.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−105%
35−40
+105%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Valorant 40−45
−72.7%
75−80
+72.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Dota 2 28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 6% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX570 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX570 is 59% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 1% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 43 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.00 14.83
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

T500 Mobile has 38.9% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 64.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Intel Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 730 Graphics 730
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
6800 GT DDL GeForce 6800 GT DDL
vs
9600M GT 9600M GT
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
vs
Edge 3D 3400XL 3D 3400XL
ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
vs
GeForce MX130 MX130
Arc A780 Arc A780
vs
RX 6600M 6600M
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
S7100X FirePro S7100X
vs
GTX 1050 1050
RTX 3050 4 GB NVIDIA 3050 4 GB
vs
GTX 680 680
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T500 Mobile or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.