Arc A580 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
17.45

Arc A580 outperforms T1000 Max-Q by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking314184
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Power efficiency23.9211.91
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8963072
Core clock speed765 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60384.0
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs56192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.45
Arc A580 30.41
+74.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Max-Q 6722
Arc A580 11717
+74.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−87.3%
103
+87.3%
1440p30−35
−80%
54
+80%
4K18−20
−77.8%
32
+77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−164%
103
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−193%
85
+193%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−133%
130−140
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−117%
85−90
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−117%
100−110
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−79.1%
190−200
+79.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−170%
85−90
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−98.8%
170−180
+98.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−170%
150−160
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−55.3%
130−140
+55.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−162%
102
+162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−152%
73
+152%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−133%
130−140
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−117%
85−90
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−117%
100−110
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−79.1%
190−200
+79.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−170%
85−90
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−98.8%
170−180
+98.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−275%
214
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−115%
85−90
+115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−55.3%
130−140
+55.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−64.1%
64
+64.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−121%
64
+121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−117%
85−90
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+26.4%
87
−26.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
−170%
85−90
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−26.7%
109
+26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−211%
177
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−70%
68
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+41.7%
60
−41.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−138%
80−85
+138%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−137%
60−65
+137%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−200%
54
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−240%
51
+240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−158%
45−50
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−140%
45−50
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−145%
230−240
+145%
Hitman 3 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−149%
87
+149%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−184%
91
+184%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−282%
130
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−189%
55
+189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−88.6%
190−200
+88.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−148%
70−75
+148%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−147%
40−45
+147%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Hitman 3 12−14
−162%
30−35
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−111%
180−190
+111%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−200%
50−55
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−259%
61
+259%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−133%
56
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−306%
73
+306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−286%
27
+286%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−147%
35−40
+147%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 87% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 42% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A580 is 306% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Arc A580 is ahead in 64 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.45 30.41
Recency 27 May 2019 10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 175 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has 250% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 74.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 283 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.