Arc A750 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
15.20

Arc A750 outperforms T1000 Max-Q by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking354212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.65
Power efficiency24.4610.14
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8963584
Core clock speed765 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60537.6
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs56224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 Max-Q 15.20
Arc A750 28.35
+86.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Max-Q Samples: 257 6720
Arc A750 Samples: 1294 12537
+86.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−94.5%
107
+94.5%
1440p30−35
−103%
61
+103%
4K18−20
−100%
36
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.70
1440pno data4.74
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−265%
336
+265%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−121%
75
+121%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−270%
111
+270%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−61.4%
110−120
+61.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−193%
270
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−94.1%
66
+94.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−109%
111
+109%
Fortnite 90−95
−54.4%
130−140
+54.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−67.2%
112
+67.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−159%
132
+159%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−183%
85
+183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%
Valorant 130−140
−47.7%
190−200
+47.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−61.4%
110−120
+61.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−56.5%
144
+56.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−30.3%
270−280
+30.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−70.6%
58
+70.6%
Dota 2 95−100
−81.8%
180−190
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−92.5%
102
+92.5%
Fortnite 90−95
−54.4%
130−140
+54.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−58.2%
106
+58.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−137%
121
+137%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−62.3%
99
+62.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−127%
68
+127%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−209%
105
+209%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−320%
185
+320%
Valorant 130−140
−47.7%
190−200
+47.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−61.4%
110−120
+61.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−61.8%
55
+61.8%
Dota 2 95−100
−81.8%
180−190
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−84.9%
98
+84.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−34.3%
90
+34.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−83.3%
55
+83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−56.8%
69
+56.8%
Valorant 130−140
−47.7%
190−200
+47.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−54.4%
130−140
+54.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−178%
89
+178%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−76.7%
210−220
+76.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−51.9%
41
+51.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−210%
65
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−10.1%
170−180
+10.1%
Valorant 160−170
−42.2%
220−230
+42.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−78.3%
80−85
+78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−180%
42
+180%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−111%
76
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−97.5%
79
+97.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−133%
42
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−128%
57
+128%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−105%
75−80
+105%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−50%
45
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−231%
43
+231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−200%
69
+200%
Valorant 90−95
−101%
180−190
+101%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−100%
45−50
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−146%
30−35
+146%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−283%
23
+283%
Dota 2 55−60
−72.4%
100−105
+72.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−150%
45
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−118%
61
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−130%
23
+130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 95% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 103% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 320% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A750 surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.20 28.35
Recency 27 May 2019 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 225 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has 350% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 86.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 982 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 Max-Q or Arc A750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.