Radeon R7 350 vs Quadro RTX A6000

Place in the ranking	37	601
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.36	no data
Power efficiency	13.62	7.07
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	GA102	Cape Verde
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,649	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10752	512
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1800 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	28,300 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	604.8	25.60
Floating-point processing power	38.71 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	16
TMUs	336	32
Tensor Cores	336	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	84	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	8.6	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	176 +1000%	16−18 −1000%
1440p	135 +1025%	12−14 −1025%
4K	117 +1070%	10−12 −1070%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.41	no data
1440p	34.44	no data
4K	39.74	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

70−75
+957%

7−8

−957%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1000%	8−9 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +1100%	6−7 −1100%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1008%	12−14 −1008%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +1100%	7−8 −1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +957%	7−8 −957%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +1033%	9−10 −1033%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +994%	18−20 −994%
Hitman 3	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +969%	16−18 −969%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +992%	12−14 −992%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +956%	9−10 −956%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 +1000%	14−16 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +1000%	12−14 −1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1000%	8−9 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +1100%	6−7 −1100%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1008%	12−14 −1008%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +1100%	7−8 −1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +957%	7−8 −957%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +1033%	9−10 −1033%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +994%	18−20 −994%
Hitman 3	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +969%	16−18 −969%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +992%	12−14 −992%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +956%	9−10 −956%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	293 +985%	27−30 −985%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +975%	8−9 −975%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +1000%	12−14 −1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1000%	8−9 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +1100%	6−7 −1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +1100%	7−8 −1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +957%	7−8 −957%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +994%	18−20 −994%
Hitman 3	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Horizon Zero Dawn	224 +967%	21−24 −967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	288 +967%	27−30 −967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +1000%	12−14 −1000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+956%

9−10

−956%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +1057%	7−8 −1057%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +967%	6−7 −967%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +1125%	4−5 −1125%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +1033%	3−4 −1033%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +995%	21−24 −995%
Hitman 3	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210 +1067%	18−20 −1067%
Metro Exodus	63 +1160%	5−6 −1160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	247 +1076%	21−24 −1076%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +1140%	5−6 −1140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +1000%	18−20 −1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+1100%

6−7

−1100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Hitman 3	30−35 +1033%	3−4 −1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +1075%	16−18 −1075%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	146 +1117%	12−14 −1117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +1060%	5−6 −1060%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	149 +964%	14−16 −964%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+1133%

3−4

−1133%

This is how RTX A6000 and R7 350 compete in popular games:

RTX A6000 is 1000% faster in 1080p
RTX A6000 is 1025% faster in 1440p
RTX A6000 is 1070% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	58.63	5.58
Recency	5 October 2020	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	55 Watt

RTX A6000 has a 950.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 445.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.