Radeon R7 350 vs Quadro RTX A6000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro RTX A6000 with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.
RTX A6000 outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 965% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 54 | 668 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.89 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.96 | 7.15 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GA102 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 October 2020 (5 years ago) | 6 July 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 10752 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 28,300 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 604.8 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 38.71 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 112 | 16 |
| TMUs | 336 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 336 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 768.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 158
+1029%
| 14−16
−1029%
|
| 1440p | 123
+1130%
| 10−12
−1130%
|
| 4K | 106
+1078%
| 9−10
−1078%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 29.42 | no data |
| 1440p | 37.80 | no data |
| 4K | 43.86 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1067%
|
24−27
−1067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 130−140
+1025%
|
12−14
−1025%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1043%
|
14−16
−1043%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1067%
|
24−27
−1067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 130−140
+1025%
|
12−14
−1025%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+1110%
|
10−11
−1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 52
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1071%
|
21−24
−1071%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1083%
|
18−20
−1083%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+1107%
|
14−16
−1107%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+988%
|
16−18
−988%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1019%
|
27−30
−1019%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1043%
|
14−16
−1043%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1067%
|
24−27
−1067%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+1058%
|
24−27
−1058%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 130−140
+1025%
|
12−14
−1025%
|
| Dota 2 | 139
+1058%
|
12−14
−1058%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+1110%
|
10−11
−1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 53
+1225%
|
4−5
−1225%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1071%
|
21−24
−1071%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1083%
|
18−20
−1083%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 160−170
+1107%
|
14−16
−1107%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 128
+967%
|
12−14
−967%
|
| Metro Exodus | 98
+989%
|
9−10
−989%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+988%
|
16−18
−988%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 307
+1037%
|
27−30
−1037%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1019%
|
27−30
−1019%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1043%
|
14−16
−1043%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 130−140
+1025%
|
12−14
−1025%
|
| Dota 2 | 131
+992%
|
12−14
−992%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+1110%
|
10−11
−1110%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 52
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1083%
|
18−20
−1083%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+988%
|
16−18
−988%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 180
+1025%
|
16−18
−1025%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1019%
|
27−30
−1019%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1071%
|
21−24
−1071%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+1029%
|
14−16
−1029%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 400−450
+1060%
|
35−40
−1060%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 96
+967%
|
9−10
−967%
|
| Metro Exodus | 84
+1100%
|
7−8
−1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+994%
|
16−18
−994%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1057%
|
30−33
−1057%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+1025%
|
12−14
−1025%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+1117%
|
6−7
−1117%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 110−120
+1090%
|
10−11
−1090%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 52
+1200%
|
4−5
−1200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+994%
|
16−18
−994%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 120−130
+1120%
|
10−11
−1120%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160
+979%
|
14−16
−979%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+1067%
|
6−7
−1067%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 155
+1007%
|
14−16
−1007%
|
| Metro Exodus | 70
+1067%
|
6−7
−1067%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 146
+1117%
|
12−14
−1117%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1052%
|
27−30
−1052%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+1075%
|
8−9
−1075%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+1067%
|
6−7
−1067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
| Dota 2 | 128
+967%
|
12−14
−967%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 75−80
+1000%
|
7−8
−1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50
+1150%
|
4−5
−1150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+1160%
|
10−11
−1160%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+967%
|
9−10
−967%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+1029%
|
7−8
−1029%
|
This is how RTX A6000 and R7 350 compete in popular games:
- RTX A6000 is 1029% faster in 1080p
- RTX A6000 is 1130% faster in 1440p
- RTX A6000 is 1078% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 54.30 | 5.10 |
| Recency | 5 October 2020 | 6 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 55 Watt |
RTX A6000 has a 964.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
R7 350, on the other hand, has 445.5% lower power consumption.
The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
