GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX A6000

Place in the ranking	38	35
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.87	83.15
Power efficiency	13.48	25.59
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA102	AD106
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,649	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti has 665% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10752	4352
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1800 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	604.8	344.8
Floating-point processing power	38.71 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	48
TMUs	336	136
Tensor Cores	336	136
Ray Tracing Cores	84	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	240 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A6000 58.61

RTX 4060 Ti 59.33
+1.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22535

RTX 4060 Ti 22814
+1.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	175 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
1440p	129 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
4K	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.57 −1032%	2.35 +1032%
1440p	36.04 −1074%	3.07 +1074%
4K	40.78 −1024%	3.63 +1024%

RTX 4060 Ti has 1032% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti has 1074% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti has 1024% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Elden Ring	210−220 −0.5%	220−230 +0.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	300 +0%	300−310 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
Valorant	260−270 +0.4%	260−270 −0.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Dota 2	132 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Elden Ring	210−220 −0.5%	220−230 +0.5%
Far Cry 5	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Fortnite	230−240 +0.4%	230−240 −0.4%
Forza Horizon 4	293 +1%	290−300 −1%
Grand Theft Auto V	128 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
Metro Exodus	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +2.4%	170−180 −2.4%
Valorant	260−270 +0.4%	260−270 −0.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.4%	280−290 +0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Dota 2	131 +0.8%	130−140 −0.8%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Forza Horizon 4	288 −0.7%	290−300 +0.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Valorant	260−270 +0.4%	260−270 −0.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	96 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%
Elden Ring	140−150 +0.7%	140−150 −0.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	96 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
World of Tanks	350−400 +10%	350−400 −10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	247 −1.2%	250−260 +1.2%
Metro Exodus	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +0.8%	120−130 −0.8%
Valorant	220−230 +3.2%	220−230 −3.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Dota 2	155 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Elden Ring	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	155 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Metro Exodus	70 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −1%	210−220 +1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	155 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Dota 2	128 +6.7%	120−130 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +5%	100−105 −5%
Fortnite	95−100 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%
Forza Horizon 4	149 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%
Valorant	120−130 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%

This is how RTX A6000 and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX A6000 is 3% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 1% faster in 1440p
RTX A6000 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	58.61	59.33
Recency	5 October 2020	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	160 Watt

RTX A6000 has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX A6000 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.