Radeon HD 7750M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	110	725
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.56	0.38
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	N19E-Q5	Lombok XL
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$3065	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Mobile has 2153% better value for money than HD 7750M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	512
Core clock speed	1035 / 1350 MHz	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 / 1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 / 150 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	18.40
Floating-point performance	no data	588.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon HD 7750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 38.41
+1147%

HD 7750M 3.08

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7750M by 1147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 5000 Mobile 14832
+1145%

HD 7750M 1191

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7750M by 1145% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+1081%

HD 7750M 2085

Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7750M by 1081% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +1220%	10−12 −1220%
1440p	86 +1333%	6−7 −1333%
4K	54 +1250%	4−5 −1250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	no data
Battlefield 5	120−130	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	125	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Hitman 3	75−80	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Metro Exodus	144	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	113	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	no data
Battlefield 5	120−130	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Hitman 3	75−80	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Metro Exodus	72	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	112	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	135	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	81	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33	no data
Far Cry 5	102	no data
Forza Horizon 4	80−85	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	70−75 +1340%	5−6 −1340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +1229%	7−8 −1229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	30−35 +1450%	2−3 −1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +1320%	5−6 −1320%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and HD 7750M compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Mobile is 1220% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 1333% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Mobile is 1250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.41	3.08
Recency	27 May 2019	24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	28 Watt