Quadro K3000M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Quadro K3000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
31.03
+750%

5000 Mobile outperforms K3000M by a whopping 750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking176741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.68
Power efficiency22.773.93
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU104GK104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072576
Core clock speed1035 MHz654 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate296.631.39
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS0.7534 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs19248
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MB48 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s89.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.5+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Mobile 31.03
+750%
K3000M 3.65

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+914%
K3000M 2427

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 5000 Mobile 54153
+355%
K3000M 11902

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p280−290
+748%
33
−748%
Full HD132
+257%
37
−257%
1440p84
+833%
9−10
−833%
4K54
+800%
6−7
−800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.19
1440pno data17.22
4Kno data25.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+1063%
16−18
−1063%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 165
+1000%
14−16
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+1063%
16−18
−1063%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Far Cry 5 128
+967%
12−14
−967%
Fortnite 140−150
+577%
21−24
−577%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+579%
18−20
−579%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+731%
16−18
−731%
Valorant 200−210
+278%
50−55
−278%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 162
+980%
14−16
−980%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+1063%
16−18
−1063%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+296%
70−75
−296%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Dota 2 98
+180%
35−40
−180%
Far Cry 5 123
+925%
12−14
−925%
Fortnite 140−150
+577%
21−24
−577%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+579%
18−20
−579%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+850%
12−14
−850%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
Metro Exodus 99
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+731%
16−18
−731%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+1408%
12−14
−1408%
Valorant 200−210
+278%
50−55
−278%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 152
+913%
14−16
−913%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Dota 2 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Far Cry 5 115
+858%
12−14
−858%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+579%
18−20
−579%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+731%
16−18
−731%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+733%
12−14
−733%
Valorant 181
+235%
50−55
−235%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+577%
21−24
−577%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+670%
30−33
−670%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Metro Exodus 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+465%
30−35
−465%
Valorant 230−240
+480%
40−45
−480%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Far Cry 5 102
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+911%
9−10
−911%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1080%
5−6
−1080%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+1114%
7−8
−1114%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+788%
8−9
−788%
Valorant 200−210
+963%
18−20
−963%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73
+813%
8−9
−813%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 100−105
+669%
12−14
−669%
Far Cry 5 56
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1100%
5−6
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and K3000M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 748% faster in 900p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 257% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 833% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed K3000M in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.03 3.65
Recency 27 May 2019 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 750.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

K3000M, on the other hand, has 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K3000M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Quadro K3000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 46 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 70 votes

Rate Quadro K3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or Quadro K3000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.