RTX A4500 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	155	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.41	19.32
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	GA102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	7168
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	259.2	369.6
Floating-point processing power	8.294 TFLOPS	23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	192	224
Tensor Cores	384	224
Ray Tracing Cores	48	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	640.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 34.12

RTX A4500 56.04
+64.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 13113

RTX A4500 21538
+64.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 −57.4%	170−180 +57.4%
1440p	66 −51.5%	100−110 +51.5%
4K	45 −55.6%	70−75 +55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −59.4%	110−120 +59.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85 −52.9%	130−140 +52.9%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −59.4%	110−120 +59.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −62.5%	260−270 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −59.1%	140−150 +59.1%
Metro Exodus	94 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	97 −54.6%	150−160 +54.6%
Valorant	161 −61.5%	260−270 +61.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −56.3%	150−160 +56.3%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −59.4%	110−120 +59.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%
Dota 2	113 −59.3%	180−190 +59.3%
Far Cry 5	79 −51.9%	120−130 +51.9%
Fortnite	150−160 −60.3%	250−260 +60.3%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −62.5%	260−270 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −59.1%	140−150 +59.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	108 −57.4%	170−180 +57.4%
Metro Exodus	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −59.6%	300−310 +59.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50 −60%	80−85 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −62.4%	190−200 +62.4%
Valorant	94 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
World of Tanks	270−280 −61.9%	450−500 +61.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75 −60%	120−130 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −59.4%	110−120 +59.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%
Dota 2	118 −61%	190−200 +61%
Far Cry 5	176 −59.1%	280−290 +59.1%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −62.5%	260−270 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −59.1%	140−150 +59.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −59.6%	300−310 +59.6%
Valorant	141 −63.1%	230−240 +63.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 −63.9%	100−105 +63.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −61.3%	100−105 +61.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −60%	280−290 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
World of Tanks	210−220 −60.6%	350−400 +60.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Far Cry 5	110 −63.6%	180−190 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −56.3%	150−160 +56.3%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −60.7%	90−95 +60.7%
Metro Exodus	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −60.7%	90−95 +60.7%
Valorant	98 −63.3%	160−170 +63.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Dota 2	79 −51.9%	120−130 +51.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 −51.9%	120−130 +51.9%
Metro Exodus	26 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −57.4%	170−180 +57.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 −51.9%	120−130 +51.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	47 −59.6%	75−80 +59.6%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Dota 2	99 −61.6%	160−170 +61.6%
Far Cry 5	52 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Fortnite	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −63.6%	90−95 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Valorant	51 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%

This is how RTX 5000 Max-Q and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

RTX A4500 is 57% faster in 1080p
RTX A4500 is 52% faster in 1440p
RTX A4500 is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.12	56.04
Recency	27 May 2019	23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has 150% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 64.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.