Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs RTX A4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA102TU106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2021 (2 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71681920
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate369.6165.6
ROPs9664
TMUs224120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB6 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth640.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.67.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2021 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 160 Watt

RTX A4500 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4500 and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 189 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.