Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
34.05
+13.9%

RTX 4000 outperforms Pro Vega 64X by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.66no data
Power efficiency16.939.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1005 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5375.8
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144256
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 34.05
+13.9%
Pro Vega 64X 29.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15225
+13.9%
Pro Vega 64X 13369

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 4000 85268
+8.5%
Pro Vega 64X 78565

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.05 29.90
Recency 13 November 2018 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 498 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.