Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.35
+9.6%

RTX 4000 outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 4000 RTX 4000
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.72no data
Power efficiency16.9722.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043072
Core clock speed1005 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5296.6
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS9.492 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144192
Tensor Cores288384
Ray Tracing Cores3648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+6.1%
132
−6.1%
1440p90−95
+7.1%
84
−7.1%
4K55−60
+1.9%
54
−1.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.42no data
1440p9.99no data
4K16.35no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 162
+0%
162
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+0%
181
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and RTX 5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 7% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 2% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.35 35.91
Recency 13 November 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 110 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 45.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro Vega 64X Pro Vega 64X
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RX 640 RX 640
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P520 Quadro P520

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 495 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 37 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.