AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	70	69
Value for money	35.36	0.46
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code name	TU104	Vega 20
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2018 (4 years old)	3 June 2019 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data
Current price	$1085 (1.2x MSRP)	$9999

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4096
Core clock speed	1005 MHz	1574 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	160 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.5	440.3

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	13000 MHz	1612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	416.0 GB/s	825.3 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI, 4x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	39.34	39.65
Recency	13 November 2018	3 June 2019
Memory bus width	256	4096
Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4096
Memory bandwidth	416	825.3
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	160 Watt	475 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---