GeForce GTX 285M vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 285M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.20
+1973%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GTX 285M by a whopping 1973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152945
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.681.53
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU104G92
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed1110 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate249.638.40
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data576
ROPs6416
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options-2-way
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHzUp to 1020 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 34.20
+1973%
GTX 285M 1.65

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+766%
GTX 285M 6498

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p400−450
+1805%
21
−1805%
Full HD110
+267%
30
−267%
1440p65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
4K48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+1350%
6−7
−1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1220%
5−6
−1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 125
+3025%
4−5
−3025%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+3340%
5−6
−3340%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+781%
16−18
−781%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2060%
5−6
−2060%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+1900%
9−10
−1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+247%
30−35
−247%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1220%
5−6
−1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+3340%
5−6
−3340%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+781%
16−18
−781%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2060%
5−6
−2060%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1167%
9−10
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+247%
30−35
−247%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1220%
5−6
−1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+3340%
5−6
−3340%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+656%
16−18
−656%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1167%
9−10
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+525%
12−14
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+247%
30−35
−247%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+2225%
8−9
−2225%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Metro Exodus 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+1789%
9−10
−1789%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Hitman 3 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+2171%
7−8
−2171%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and GTX 285M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 1805% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 267% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 2067% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 2300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed GTX 285M in all 51 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.20 1.65
Recency 27 May 2019 1 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 1972.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 285M, on the other hand, has 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 285M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 285M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.