Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.97
+213%

T1000 Mobile outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking321611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.2714.89
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76864
Core clock speed1395 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate69.84no data
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.97
+213%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+172%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 Mobile 31509
+118%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+218%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 53629
+221%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 16713

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 375510
+158%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 145594

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+312%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 791

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+265%
17
−265%
4K48
+243%
14−16
−243%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+220%
14−16
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+267%
14−16
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+342%
12−14
−342%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Far Cry 5 49
+308%
12
−308%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+411%
9
−411%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+231%
35−40
−231%
Hitman 3 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%
Metro Exodus 83
+361%
18
−361%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+458%
12
−458%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+175%
20−22
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+52.7%
55
−52.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+267%
14−16
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Far Cry 5 41
+273%
11
−273%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+1050%
4
−1050%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+217%
35−40
−217%
Hitman 3 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%
Metro Exodus 63
+350%
14
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+478%
9
−478%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+224%
17
−224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+64.7%
51
−64.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Far Cry 5 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Hitman 3 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+664%
11
−664%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+267%
15
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+289%
9
−289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+75%
45−50
−75%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+233%
14−16
−233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+507%
14−16
−507%
Hitman 3 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+191%
35−40
−191%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Hitman 3 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+682%
10−12
−682%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

This is how T1000 Mobile and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 265% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 243% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in all 69 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.97 5.43
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 12 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 212.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 154 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.