Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with Apple M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.20
+135%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.64no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608
Core clock speed1110 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate249.6no data
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 34.20
+135%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 14.54

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161
+58.9%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+283%
29
−283%
1440p63
+163%
24−27
−163%
4K48
+167%
18−21
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+172%
30−35
−172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+128%
45−50
−128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+136%
27−30
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Far Cry New Dawn 125
+221%
35−40
−221%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+87%
90−95
−87%
Hitman 3 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+95.8%
70−75
−95.8%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+130%
45−50
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+291%
45−50
−291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+55.3%
75−80
−55.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+116%
30−35
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+128%
45−50
−128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+136%
27−30
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+131%
35−40
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+87%
90−95
−87%
Hitman 3 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+95.8%
70−75
−95.8%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+130%
45−50
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+148%
45−50
−148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+100%
30−35
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+55.3%
75−80
−55.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+68.8%
30−35
−68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+136%
27−30
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+87%
90−95
−87%
Hitman 3 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+68.1%
70−75
−68.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+148%
45−50
−148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+121%
30−35
−121%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+55.3%
75−80
−55.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+173%
21−24
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+193%
14−16
−193%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+209%
10−12
−209%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+158%
70−75
−158%
Hitman 3 40−45
+135%
16−18
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+207%
27−30
−207%
Metro Exodus 77
+221%
24−27
−221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+213%
24−27
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+95.4%
85−90
−95.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+139%
21−24
−139%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Hitman 3 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+130%
65−70
−130%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+292%
12−14
−292%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+132%
18−20
−132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+223%
12−14
−223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 283% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed Apple M1 8-Core GPU in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.20 14.54
Recency 27 May 2019 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 135.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 916 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.