Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	471	49
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	51.93
Power efficiency	16.37	14.90
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	416.0
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.39

RX 6750 XT 53.40
+469%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3657

RX 6750 XT 20785
+468%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P620 5909

RX 6750 XT 48327
+718%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P620 25105

RX 6750 XT 104004
+314%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P620 4673

RX 6750 XT 37609
+705%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 30410

RX 6750 XT 170993
+462%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 310112

RX 6750 XT 529598
+70.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48 −244%	165 +244%
1440p	14−16 −521%	87 +521%
4K	8−9 −538%	51 +538%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.33
1440p	no data	6.31
4K	no data	10.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −876%	166 +876%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −768%	165 +768%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −665%	130 +665%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −237%	64 +237%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −868%	368 +868%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −492%	142 +492%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −477%	150 +477%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	100−105 +300%
Valorant	35−40 −544%	230−240 +544%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −541%	109 +541%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −184%	54 +184%
Dota 2	30 −430%	159 +430%
Far Cry 5	64 +30.6%	49 −30.6%
Fortnite	55−60 −286%	210−220 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −700%	304 +700%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −467%	130−140 +467%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −376%	162 +376%
Metro Exodus	6 −1900%	120 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	125 −72%	210−220 +72%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	100−105 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −500%	170−180 +500%
Valorant	35−40 −544%	230−240 +544%
World of Tanks	130−140 −102%	270−280 +102%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −465%	96 +465%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −158%	49 +158%
Dota 2	83 −57.8%	131 +57.8%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −192%	110−120 +192%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −584%	260 +584%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −438%	129 +438%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −191%	210−220 +191%
Valorant	35−40 −544%	230−240 +544%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −783%	106 +783%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −715%	106 +715%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −298%	170−180 +298%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
World of Tanks	65−70 −415%	350−400 +415%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −786%	186 +786%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −579%	95−100 +579%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −641%	126 +641%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −731%	100−110 +731%
Valorant	24−27 −729%	190−200 +729%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Dota 2	20−22 −420%	104 +420%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −420%	104 +420%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −840%	47 +840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −571%	180−190 +571%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −550%	35−40 +550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −420%	104 +420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −750%	65−70 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −333%	13 +333%
Dota 2	20−22 −405%	101 +405%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −755%	90−95 +755%
Fortnite	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −725%	99 +725%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
Valorant	9−10 −1133%	110−120 +1133%

This is how Quadro P620 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 244% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 521% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 538% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 31% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
RX 6750 XT is ahead in 62 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.39	53.40
Recency	1 February 2018	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt

Quadro P620 has 525% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 468.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.