Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.47

RX 6750 XT outperforms P620 by a whopping 467% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.96
Power efficiency16.3414.83
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed1177 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18416.0
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.47
RX 6750 XT 53.72
+467%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3660
RX 6750 XT 20772
+468%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P620 5909
RX 6750 XT 48327
+718%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P620 25105
RX 6750 XT 104004
+314%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P620 4673
RX 6750 XT 37609
+705%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 30410
RX 6750 XT 170993
+462%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 310112
RX 6750 XT 529598
+70.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−253%
166
+253%
1440p14−16
−514%
86
+514%
4K8−9
−513%
49
+513%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.31
1440pno data6.38
4Kno data11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−1014%
245
+1014%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−876%
166
+876%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−817%
165
+817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−700%
176
+700%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−290%
150−160
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−665%
130
+665%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−606%
127
+606%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−514%
178
+514%
Fortnite 113
−91.2%
210−220
+91.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−392%
190−200
+392%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−843%
217
+843%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−447%
170−180
+447%
Valorant 85−90
−216%
270−280
+216%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−373%
104
+373%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−290%
150−160
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−541%
109
+541%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−103%
270−280
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−506%
109
+506%
Dota 2 90
−71.1%
154
+71.1%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−486%
170
+486%
Fortnite 42
−414%
210−220
+414%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−392%
190−200
+392%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−709%
186
+709%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−376%
162
+376%
Metro Exodus 17
−647%
127
+647%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−447%
170−180
+447%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−666%
245
+666%
Valorant 85−90
−216%
270−280
+216%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−290%
150−160
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−465%
96
+465%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−444%
98
+444%
Dota 2 83
−57.8%
131
+57.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−445%
158
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−392%
190−200
+392%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−465%
130−140
+465%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−447%
170−180
+447%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−694%
135
+694%
Valorant 85−90
−216%
270−280
+216%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
−645%
210−220
+645%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−783%
106
+783%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−660%
76
+660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−289%
170−180
+289%
Valorant 100−105
−207%
300−350
+207%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−481%
120−130
+481%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60
+757%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−642%
141
+642%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−633%
150−160
+633%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−643%
100−110
+643%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−626%
130−140
+626%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−420%
104
+420%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1075%
47
+1075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Valorant 45−50
−537%
290−300
+537%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−730%
80−85
+730%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
Dota 2 30−35
−206%
101
+206%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−767%
78
+767%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−613%
100−110
+613%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−925%
80−85
+925%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%

This is how Quadro P620 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 253% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 514% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 513% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 1075% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6750 XT surpassed Quadro P620 in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 53.72
Recency 1 February 2018 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P620 has 525% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 467.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 641 vote

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2704 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.