Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
21.69

6750 XT outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.06
Power efficiency22.2115.19
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)3 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1139 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2416.0
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache672 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3200 Max-Q 21.69
RX 6750 XT 49.43
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q 9077
Samples: 143
RX 6750 XT 20683
+128%
Samples: 4786

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−133%
163
+133%
1440p35−40
−151%
88
+151%
4K21−24
−138%
50
+138%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data10.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+0%
245
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 151% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 138% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.69 49.43
Recency 21 February 2018 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 127.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro V7350X2
vs
Data Center GPU Max 1100 Center GPU Max 1100
Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro V7350X2
vs
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Graphics 320SP Graphics 320SP
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
L40 CNX L40 CNX
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5060 Ti RTX 5060 Ti
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 7650 GRE RX 7650 GRE
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
RTX A4 Mobile RTX A4 Mobile
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3148 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.