Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.43

6750 XT outperforms P5200 Max-Q by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.89
Power efficiency22.6015.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)3 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed1316 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate251.0416.0
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache960 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P5200 Max-Q 29.43
RX 6750 XT 49.47
+68.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12308
Samples: 30
RX 6750 XT 20688
+68.1%
Samples: 4852

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−71.6%
163
+71.6%
1440p50−55
−76%
88
+76%
4K27−30
−85.2%
50
+85.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data10.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+0%
245
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 72% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 76% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 85% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.43 49.47
Recency 21 February 2018 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 68.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6800 6800
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6400 6400
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) 64EUs (Alder Lake)
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6950 XT 6950 XT
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 730 (Rocket Lake)
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 10 GB
RTX 4000 NVIDIA RTX 4000
vs
R5 M315 M315
RTX 4000 NVIDIA RTX 4000
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5730 5730
RTX 4000 NVIDIA RTX 4000
vs
R5 430 OEM 430 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 16 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3201 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 Max-Q or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.