GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs Quadro P1000

Place in performance ranking	381	91
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	7.36	23.81
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	TU106
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2017 (7 years ago)	7 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	no data
Current price	$301 (0.8x MSRP)	$530

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 12 GB has 224% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2176
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	184 Watt
Texture fill rate	59.20	224.4
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.50

RTX 2060 12 GB 41.05
+257%

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 257% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4452

RTX 2060 12 GB 15889
+257%

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 257% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 −256%	160−170 +256%
4K	11 −218%	35−40 +218%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−233%

60−65
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −233%	130−140 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Far Cry 5	32 −244%	110−120 +244%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −241%	140−150 +241%
Hitman 3	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −250%	70−75 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −233%	130−140 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Far Cry 5	29 −245%	100−105 +245%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −241%	140−150 +241%
Hitman 3	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −250%	70−75 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 −233%	100−105 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −233%	130−140 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Far Cry 5	27 −252%	95−100 +252%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −241%	140−150 +241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −244%	55−60 +244%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Hitman 3	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −250%	70−75 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −241%	75−80 +241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Hitman 3	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 12 GB is 256% faster than Quadro P1000 in 1080p
RTX 2060 12 GB is 218% faster than Quadro P1000 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	11.50	41.05
Recency	1 February 2017	7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	184 Watt