Quadro T500 Mobile vs P6000

Place in performance ranking	103	456
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.49	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP102	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	no data
Current price	$989 (0.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	896
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	94.92
Floating-point performance	12,634 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P6000 and Quadro T500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 +317%	36 −317%
1440p	65−70 +333%	15 −333%
4K	70−75 +312%	17 −312%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+329%

14−16

−329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +317%	18−20 −317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +307%	27−30 −307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +317%	18−20 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +333%	30 −333%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +300%	24−27 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +319%	40−45 −319%
Hitman 3	70−75 +312%	16−18 −312%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +336%	35−40 −336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +300%	24−27 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +329%	27−30 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +324%	30−35 −324%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +317%	18−20 −317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +307%	27−30 −307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +317%	18−20 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +329%	28 −329%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +300%	24−27 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +319%	40−45 −319%
Hitman 3	70−75 +312%	16−18 −312%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +336%	35−40 −336%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +307%	27−30 −307%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +300%	24−27 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +329%	27−30 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +329%	28 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +324%	30−35 −324%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +317%	18−20 −317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +307%	27−30 −307%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +307%	27 −307%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +300%	24−27 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +319%	40−45 −319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +321%	19 −321%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +324%	30−35 −324%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +309%	10−12 −309%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +321%	18−20 −321%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +333%	14−16 −333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +312%	16−18 −312%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +338%	16−18 −338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Hitman 3	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +309%	10−12 −309%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%

This is how Quadro P6000 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P6000 is 317% faster in 1080p
Quadro P6000 is 333% faster in 1440p
Quadro P6000 is 312% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.18	8.93
Recency	1 October 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt