Quadro T1200 Mobile vs P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.15
+96.3%

P6000 outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking103260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.93no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP102TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1506 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate394.891.20
Floating-point performance12,634 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P6000 and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed9016 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+89.7%
58
−89.7%
1440p60−65
+81.8%
33
−81.8%
4K150−160
+85.2%
81
−85.2%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.15 19.94
Recency 1 October 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 85 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 130 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.