GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Quadro P6000
Aggregate performance score
Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 by a whopping 455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 102 | 520 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.90 | 0.75 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GP102 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2016 (7 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | $349 |
| Current price | $989 (0.2x MSRP) | $249 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro P6000 has 2420% better value for money than GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 394.8 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 432 GB/s | 152.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | no data |
| HDMI | no data | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
| nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 39.14 | 7.05 |
| Recency | 1 October 2016 | 7 December 2010 |
| Cost | $5999 | $349 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 1280 MB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 219 Watt |
The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
