GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P6000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.22
+38.8%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking108202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.21100.00
Power efficiency11.0724.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 2275% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401536
Core clock speed1506 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8152.6
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+33.3%
90
−33.3%
1440p75−80
+33.9%
56
−33.9%
4K45−50
+25%
36
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99
−1865%
2.54
+1865%
1440p79.99
−1856%
4.09
+1856%
4K133.31
−1996%
6.36
+1996%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1865% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1856% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1996% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+0%
147
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 88
+0%
88
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 232
+0%
232
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 71
+0%
71
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
World of Tanks 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 81
+0%
81
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
+0%
90
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 39
+0%
39
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 34% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.22 28.25
Recency 1 October 2016 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 38.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 91 vote

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1607 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.