GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.10
+38.5%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.23100.00
Power efficiency10.9824.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 2264% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401536
Core clock speed1506 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8152.6
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+33.3%
90
−33.3%
1440p80−85
+33.3%
60
−33.3%
4K50−55
+31.6%
38
−31.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99
−1865%
2.54
+1865%
1440p74.99
−1865%
3.82
+1865%
4K119.98
−1891%
6.03
+1891%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1865% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1865% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1891% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 207
+0%
207
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 197
+0%
197
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 32% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.10 28.23
Recency 1 October 2016 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 38.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 3050 8 GB GA107
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile 3050 A Mobile
M3000 SE NVIDIA M3000 SE
vs
GT 320 OEM 320 OEM
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GT 1030 1030
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Quadro 600 600
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Graphics G7 80EUs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RTX A4000 Max-Q Max-Q
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 830
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
GeForce MX230 MX230
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Jetson Xavier NX GPU Xavier NX GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 95 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1612 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.