GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro P6000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P6000
2016
24GB 384-bit
39.10
+49.1%

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking104192
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.8627.06
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)29 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)$206

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 43% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401280
Core clock speed1506 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8138.0
Floating-point performance12,634 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed9016 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.10
+49.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 26.22

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P6000 15132
+49.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 10148

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 49% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P6000 60145
+8.5%
GTX 1650 SUPER 55416

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 9% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P6000 77095
+43.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 53879

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 43% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P6000 47462
GTX 1650 SUPER 56481
+19%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro P6000 by 19% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+38.9%
72
−38.9%
1440p50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
4K30−35
+36.4%
22
−36.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.10 26.22
Recency 1 October 2016 29 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 125 Watt

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 85 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4203 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.