GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy Quadro P6000
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
37.37
+13.6%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1080 Mobile by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.3242.96
Power efficiency10.9416.05
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $499.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 894% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1506 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1771 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate394.8283.4
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS9.068 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+13%
115
−13%
1440p80−85
+12.7%
71
−12.7%
4K60−65
+9.1%
55
−9.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p46.15
−961%
4.35
+961%
1440p74.99
−965%
7.04
+965%
4K99.98
−1000%
9.09
+1000%
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 961% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 965% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 1000% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 188
+0%
188
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+0%
119
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+0%
115
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 186
+0%
186
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+0%
102
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+0%
91
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+0%
150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 183
+0%
183
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+0%
87
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88
+0%
88
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 178
+0%
178
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+0%
42
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 9% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.37 32.90
Recency 1 October 2016 15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 13.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1080 Mobile, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RX 570 RX 570
Riva TNT Riva TNT
vs
ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP PRO Turbo AGP
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
vs
HD 7640G HD 7640G
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro SSG Pro SSG
NVS 280 AGP Quadro NVS 280 AGP
vs
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
W5130M FirePro W5130M
vs
Quadro K610M Quadro K610M
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
2270 PCIe x1 FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
ATI FireGL X1-128 X1 128

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 98 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 347 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.