Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs Quadro P5200

Place in performance ranking	163	982
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.52	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	GP104	Stoney Ridge
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$3894	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	192
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.86
+2278%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.34

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 2278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 25100
+1886%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1264

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 1886% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 65844
+1868%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 3346

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 1868% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 18467
+2292%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 772

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 2292% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 106328
+2136%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 4755

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 2136% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130 +1525%	8 −1525%
4K	60 +2900%	2−3 −2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +2650%	2−3 −2650%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +2500%	4−5 −2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	95−100	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +2650%	2−3 −2650%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +2500%	4−5 −2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	95−100 +2350%	4−5 −2350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +2650%	2−3 −2650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70	no data
Metro Exodus	60−65 +2950%	2−3 −2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +2367%	3−4 −2367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Hitman 3	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +4500%	1−2 −4500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	0−1
Far Cry 5	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Metro Exodus	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	0−1