GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	160	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	30.41
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GP104	AD103-275
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	no data	$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	8448
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	251.0	689.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.9 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 31.99

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.15
+157%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P5200 Max-Q 12355

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31723
+157%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 157% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80−85 −170%	216 +170%
1440p	55−60 −173%	150 +173%
4K	35−40 −163%	92 +163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −162%	130−140 +162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −171%	140−150 +171%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −157%	240−250 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 −168%	200−210 +168%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −164%	250−260 +164%
Hitman 3	45−50 −173%	120−130 +173%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −167%	300−350 +167%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −171%	140−150 +171%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −176%	120−130 +176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −159%	467 +159%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −163%	171 +163%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −162%	130−140 +162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −171%	140−150 +171%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −157%	240−250 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 −168%	200−210 +168%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −164%	250−260 +164%
Hitman 3	45−50 −173%	120−130 +173%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −167%	300−350 +167%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −171%	140−150 +171%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −176%	120−130 +176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −160%	442 +160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 −169%	430 +169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −164%	140−150 +164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −162%	130−140 +162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −171%	140−150 +171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −162%	110−120 +162%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −164%	250−260 +164%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −167%	300−350 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −171%	407 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −163%	210 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −162%	144 +162%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−176%

120−130

+176%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −177%	160−170 +177%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −162%	140−150 +162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −183%	95−100 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −170%	100−110 +170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −180%	110−120 +180%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −167%	187 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −165%	210−220 +165%
Hitman 3	45−50 −169%	120−130 +169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −162%	220−230 +162%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −184%	120−130 +184%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −178%	306 +178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −165%	159 +165%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −158%	116 +158%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−180%

120−130

+180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −193%	85−90 +193%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −188%	65−70 +188%
Hitman 3	27−30 −181%	75−80 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −172%	130−140 +172%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −175%	110 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −162%	130−140 +162%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −167%	70−75 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −188%	65−70 +188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −175%	160−170 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −172%	130−140 +172%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −189%	100−110 +189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −188%	69 +188%