T400 vs Quadro P520

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

We've compared mobile workstation GPU Quadro P520 with desktop GPU T400, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P520
2019
2048 MB GDDR5
5.44

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking575436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0816.46
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP108TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$1670 $83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 1424% better value for money than Quadro P520.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1303 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate35.8334.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P520 and T400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P520 5.44
T400 9.37
+72.2%

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P520 2106
T400 3628
+72.3%

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by 72% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P520 7411
T400 16889
+128%

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by 128% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P520 8076
T400 15891
+96.8%

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by 97% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P520 7481
T400 16856
+125%

T400 outperforms Quadro P520 by 125% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
4K20
−50%
30−35
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 20
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Metro Exodus 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 16
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Hitman 3 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hitman 3 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how Quadro P520 and T400 compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 67% faster in 1080p
  • T400 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.44 9.37
Recency 27 May 2019 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 30 Watt

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation card while T400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 364 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.