Radeon Vega 7 Mobile vs Quadro P520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking606not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP108Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384448
Core clock speed1303 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate35.8353.20
Floating-point performance1.147 gflops1.702 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro P520 has 150% lower power consumption.

Vega 7 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P520 and Radeon Vega 7 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
AMD Radeon Vega 7 Mobile
Radeon Vega 7 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 97 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 35 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.