GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4200

Place in performance ranking	196	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	75
Value for money	7.56	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	GN20-P1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 May 2018 (5 years ago)	10 May 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price	$1526	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2560
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1222 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	237.2	118.8

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7132 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	75−80 +0%	75 +0%
1440p	40−45 −5%	42 +5%
4K	24−27 −8.3%	26 +8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−51.2%

62
+51.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −36.4%	60 +36.4%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −33.3%	108 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −43.9%	59 +43.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −19.7%	79 +19.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −27.3%	84 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 −40%	105 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20.4%	65 +20.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −85.4%	76 +85.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −72.7%	95 +72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −22.9%	59 +22.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +25.7%	35 −25.7%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −21%	98 +21%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −9.8%	45 +9.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −12.1%	74 +12.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −24.2%	82 +24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 −18.7%	89 +18.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −3.7%	56 +3.7%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −35.7%	57 +35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +5.1%	39 −5.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −38.2%	76 +38.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −61.4%	92 +61.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −14.6%	55 +14.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +69.2%	26 −69.2%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −9.9%	89 +9.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +2.5%	40 −2.5%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −3%	68 +3%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −10.6%	73 +10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +14%	50 −14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +71.4%	28 −71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Hitman 3	40−45 −47.6%	62 +47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −57.6%	52 +57.6%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −36%	34 +36%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −29.4%	44 +29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −4%	26 +4%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −23.2%	69 +23.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −37.5%	22 +37.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −16.3%	50 +16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −25%	60 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −5.3%	20 +5.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 −37.5%	33 +37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −40%	21 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −7.4%	29 +7.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −26.7%	38 +26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −16.7%	28 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +10%	10 −10%

This is how Quadro P4200 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 0% faster than Quadro P4200 in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 5% faster than Quadro P4200 in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 8.3% faster than Quadro P4200 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 71.4% faster than the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 85.4% faster than the Quadro P4200.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is ahead in 10 tests (15%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 41 test (60%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	25.05	24.99
Recency	7 May 2018	10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	60 Watt