GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4000

Place in performance ranking	172	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	25.18	18.08
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	N18P-G62
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data
Current price	$485 (0.6x MSRP)	$892

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 39% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1024
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	165.8	95.04
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.140
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.09
+49.4%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.14

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4000 11652
+49.5%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 49% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	68 +15.3%	59 −15.3%
1440p	65−70 +47.7%	44 −47.7%
4K	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

−15.7%

59
+15.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −7%	61 +7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +8.2%	49 −8.2%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +11.9%	84 −11.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +14.1%	71 −14.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +10.9%	46 −10.9%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +16.4%	67 −16.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +16.7%	66 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +40.6%	65−70 −40.6%
Hitman 3	90−95 +12%	83 −12%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +4.8%	62 −4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −10.2%	54 +10.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +6.2%	65 −6.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −5.3%	60 +5.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +23.9%	46 −23.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +65.6%	32 −65.6%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +28.8%	73 −28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +39.7%	58 −39.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +41.7%	36 −41.7%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +25.8%	62 −25.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +24.2%	62 −24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +40.6%	65−70 −40.6%
Hitman 3	90−95 +38.8%	67 −38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +38.3%	47 −38.3%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +36.8%	38 −36.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +69%	29 −69%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +30.2%	53 −30.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77 +6.9%	72 −6.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +9.6%	52 −9.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +111%	27 −111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +253%	15 −253%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +40.3%	67 −40.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +50%	34 −50%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +34.5%	58 −34.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +35.1%	57 −35.1%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +40.6%	65−70 −40.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41 +5.1%	39 −5.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +159%	22 −159%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +29.7%	37 −29.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 +33.3%	39 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +63.2%	18−20 −63.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +35.3%	17 −35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +31.3%	32 −31.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +50%	21−24 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +63.2%	18−20 −63.2%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +29.4%	51 −29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +55.9%	30−35 −55.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +48.7%	35−40 −48.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +53.7%	40−45 −53.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +77.3%	21−24 −77.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +31.6%	19 −31.6%
Hitman 3	27−30 +38.1%	21 −38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +22.2%	18 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +36%	25 −36%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +28.6%	28 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +68.8%	16−18 −68.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +50%	27−30 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%

This is how Quadro P4000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P4000 is 15.3% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in 1080p
Quadro P4000 is 47.7% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in 1440p
Quadro P4000 is 45.8% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 253% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 15.7% faster than the Quadro P4000.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P4000 is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	30.09	20.14
Recency	6 February 2017	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt