GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro P4000

Place in performance ranking	171	960
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.93	0.02
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP104	N13P-GL/GL2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data
Current price	$485 (0.6x MSRP)	$1121

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 129550% better value for money than GT 630M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	96
CUDA cores	no data	96
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	Up to 800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	165.8	Up to 12.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	253.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 and GeForce GT 630M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	Up to 128bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	Up to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	Up to 2048x1536
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	no data	+
Optimus	+	+
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2	no data	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	6.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.18
+2056%

GT 630M 1.40

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 2056% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4000 11655
+2062%

GT 630M 539

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 2062% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P4000 39075
+1559%

GT 630M 2355

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 1559% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P4000 102
+1357%

GT 630M 7

Quadro P4000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 1357% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	400−450 +2005%	19 −2005%
Full HD	68 +325%	16 −325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +2500%	2−3 −2500%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +2350%	4−5 −2350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	65−70	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	60−65	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	90−95 +2250%	4−5 −2250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +2500%	2−3 −2500%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +2350%	4−5 −2350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	65−70	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	60−65	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	90−95 +2250%	4−5 −2250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +2500%	2−3 −2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	50−55	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65	no data
Metro Exodus	55−60 +2750%	2−3 −2750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +2200%	3−4 −2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Hitman 3	24−27 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Metro Exodus	30−33	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

no data

This is how Quadro P4000 and GT 630M compete in popular games:

Quadro P4000 is 2005% faster in 900p
Quadro P4000 is 325% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.18	1.40
Recency	6 February 2017	6 December 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	33 Watt