Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro P1000

Place in the ranking	417	52
Place by popularity	not in top-100	92
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.73	56.81
Power efficiency	20.05	15.45
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 891% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2560
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.61	413.0
Floating-point processing power	1.555 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.50

RX 6700 XT 50.96
+343%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4475

RX 6700 XT 19838
+343%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P1000 6001

RX 6700 XT 45676
+661%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P1000 24240

RX 6700 XT 109039
+350%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787

RX 6700 XT 35504
+642%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P1000 30721

RX 6700 XT 176617
+475%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 −235%	154 +235%
1440p	18−20 −367%	84 +367%
4K	11 −345%	49 +345%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	8.15 −162%	3.11 +162%
1440p	20.83 −265%	5.70 +265%
4K	34.09 −249%	9.78 +249%

RX 6700 XT has 162% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6700 XT has 265% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6700 XT has 249% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −695%	159 +695%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −417%	119 +417%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −205%	110−120 +205%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −515%	123 +515%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −352%	104 +352%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −628%	342 +628%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −337%	131 +337%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −369%	150 +369%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −220%	95−100 +220%
Valorant	45−50 −374%	210−220 +374%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −205%	110−120 +205%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −420%	104 +420%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −296%	91 +296%
Dota 2	40−45 −295%	166 +295%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −35.6%	61 +35.6%
Fortnite	41 −407%	200−210 +407%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −498%	281 +498%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −383%	145 +383%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −283%	161 +283%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −266%	117 +266%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	103 −109%	210−220 +109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −220%	95−100 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −397%	170−180 +397%
Valorant	45−50 −374%	210−220 +374%
World of Tanks	160−170 −72.2%	270−280 +72.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −205%	110−120 +205%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −355%	91 +355%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −257%	82 +257%
Dota 2	40−45 −231%	139 +231%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −147%	110−120 +147%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −411%	240 +411%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −290%	117 +290%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −144%	210−220 +144%
Valorant	45−50 −374%	210−220 +374%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −538%	102 +538%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −538%	102 +538%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −146%	170−180 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −460%	55−60 +460%
World of Tanks	80−85 −299%	300−350 +299%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −265%	80−85 +265%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −500%	54 +500%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −512%	150−160 +512%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −541%	173 +541%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −422%	94 +422%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −413%	123 +413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −573%	100−110 +573%
Valorant	27−30 −538%	180−190 +538%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Dota 2	21−24 −364%	102 +364%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −364%	102 +364%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −514%	43 +514%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −421%	170−180 +421%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −364%	102 +364%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −540%	60−65 +540%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24 +700%
Dota 2	21−24 −382%	106 +382%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −521%	85−90 +521%
Fortnite	12−14 −538%	80−85 +538%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −481%	93 +481%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −563%	50−55 +563%
Valorant	12−14 −750%	100−110 +750%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 235% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 367% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 345% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6700 XT surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.50	50.96
Recency	7 February 2017	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	230 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 475% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 343.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.