Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro P1000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.38

RX 6700 XT outperforms P1000 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42254
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.7056.64
Power efficiency19.9915.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 894% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed1493 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate48.61413.0
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 11.38
RX 6700 XT 50.41
+343%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4479
RX 6700 XT 19835
+343%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P1000 6001
RX 6700 XT 45676
+661%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P1000 24240
RX 6700 XT 109039
+350%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787
RX 6700 XT 35504
+642%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P1000 30721
RX 6700 XT 176617
+475%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−248%
153
+248%
1440p18−20
−350%
81
+350%
4K11
−327%
47
+327%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52
−172%
3.13
+172%
1440p20.83
−252%
5.91
+252%
4K34.09
−235%
10.19
+235%
  • RX 6700 XT has 172% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 252% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 235% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−759%
232
+759%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−695%
159
+695%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−441%
119
+441%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−526%
169
+526%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−208%
140−150
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−515%
123
+515%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−350%
99
+350%
Far Cry 5 32
−456%
178
+456%
Fortnite 65−70
−215%
200−210
+215%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−289%
180−190
+289%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−672%
224
+672%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−344%
170−180
+344%
Valorant 100−105
−164%
260−270
+164%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−274%
101
+274%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−208%
140−150
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−420%
104
+420%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−73.8%
270−280
+73.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−309%
90
+309%
Dota 2 75−80
−130%
175
+130%
Far Cry 5 29
−483%
169
+483%
Fortnite 65−70
−215%
200−210
+215%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−289%
180−190
+289%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−590%
200
+590%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−283%
161
+283%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−441%
119
+441%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−344%
170−180
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−643%
223
+643%
Valorant 100−105
−164%
260−270
+164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−208%
140−150
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−355%
91
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−286%
85
+286%
Dota 2 75−80
−82.9%
139
+82.9%
Far Cry 5 27
−489%
159
+489%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−289%
180−190
+289%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−344%
170−180
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−694%
127
+694%
Valorant 100−105
−164%
260−270
+164%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−215%
200−210
+215%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−171%
35−40
+171%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−300%
300−350
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−538%
102
+538%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−446%
71
+446%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−182%
170−180
+182%
Valorant 120−130
−145%
290−300
+145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−318%
110−120
+318%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−522%
56
+522%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−496%
137
+496%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−458%
140−150
+458%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−471%
95−100
+471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−470%
130−140
+470%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−364%
102
+364%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−514%
43
+514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−469%
74
+469%
Valorant 55−60
−388%
280−290
+388%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−457%
75−80
+457%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−525%
25
+525%
Dota 2 40−45
−165%
106
+165%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−545%
71
+545%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−421%
95−100
+421%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 248% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 350% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 327% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 759% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6700 XT surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.38 50.41
Recency 7 February 2017 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 230 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 475% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 343% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 589 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7047 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.