GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Quadro P1000

Place in performance ranking	384	184
Place by popularity	not in top-100	44
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.27	37.74
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	GA107
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2017 (7 years ago)	2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$179
Current price	$301 (0.8x MSRP)	$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 419% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2304
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1470 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	59.20	105.8
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	242 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.54

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.88
+142%

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4455

RTX 3050 6 GB 10766
+142%

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 142% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−133%

100−110
+133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−122%

40−45
+122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −141%	65−70 +141%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −132%	130−140 +132%
Hitman 3	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −129%	110−120 +129%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −138%	95−100 +138%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −141%	65−70 +141%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	100 −140%	240−250 +140%
Hitman 3	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −129%	110−120 +129%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 −133%	70−75 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −138%	95−100 +138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −141%	65−70 +141%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −132%	130−140 +132%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −129%	110−120 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −119%	35−40 +119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −138%	95−100 +138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−134%

75−80
+134%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Hitman 3	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −135%	40−45 +135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−137%

45−50
+137%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Hitman 3	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−118%

24−27
+118%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 6 GB is 133% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.54	27.88
Recency	1 February 2017	2 February 2024
Cost	$375	$179
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt