Quadro T600 Mobile vs NVS 510M

Place in performance ranking	1160	307
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	G71	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 August 2006 (17 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$105	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	896
Core clock speed	450 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	74.76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro NVS 510M and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

1−2

−5000%

51
+5000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−2400%

650−700
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −2493%	1400−1450 +2493%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −2400%	650−700 +2400%
Far Cry 5	53 −2542%	1400−1450 +2542%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −2456%	1150−1200 +2456%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2497%	2000−2050 +2497%
Hitman 3	30−35 −2556%	850−900 +2556%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −2552%	1750−1800 +2552%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −2509%	1200−1250 +2509%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 −2542%	1400−1450 +2542%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −2496%	1350−1400 +2496%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −2493%	1400−1450 +2493%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −2400%	650−700 +2400%
Far Cry 5	49 −2553%	1300−1350 +2553%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −2456%	1150−1200 +2456%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2497%	2000−2050 +2497%
Hitman 3	30−35 −2556%	850−900 +2556%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −2552%	1750−1800 +2552%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −2536%	1450−1500 +2536%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −2509%	1200−1250 +2509%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 −2464%	1000−1050 +2464%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 −2496%	1350−1400 +2496%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −2496%	1350−1400 +2496%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −2493%	1400−1450 +2493%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −2400%	650−700 +2400%
Far Cry 5	45 −2456%	1150−1200 +2456%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −2456%	1150−1200 +2456%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2497%	2000−2050 +2497%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −2400%	700−750 +2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −2496%	1350−1400 +2496%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −2400%	500−550 +2400%
Hitman 3	20−22 −2400%	500−550 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −2476%	850−900 +2476%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −2400%	750−800 +2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −2493%	700−750 +2493%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −2481%	800−850 +2481%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −2400%	450−500 +2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −2547%	450−500 +2547%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −2400%	350−400 +2400%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −2556%	850−900 +2556%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −2456%	230−240 +2456%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −2493%	700−750 +2493%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −2481%	800−850 +2481%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −2556%	850−900 +2556%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −2536%	290−300 +2536%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −2525%	210−220 +2525%
Hitman 3	12−14 −2400%	300−310 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −2400%	450−500 +2400%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −2400%	400−450 +2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −2233%	350−400 +2233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2500%	260−270 +2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −2400%	400−450 +2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −2456%	230−240 +2456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −2525%	210−220 +2525%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −2400%	400−450 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −2456%	230−240 +2456%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −2400%	300−310 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −2400%	550−600 +2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%

This is how NVS 510M and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

T600 Mobile is 5000% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.62	16.48
Recency	21 August 2006	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt