GeForce GT 330M vs Radeon Pro 555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555 with GeForce GT 330M, including specs and performance data.

Pro 555
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.98
+1351%

Pro 555 outperforms GT 330M by a whopping 1351% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5221224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.471.68
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 21GT216
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed850 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8010.00
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data182
ROPs168
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s25.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 555 7.98
+1351%
GT 330M 0.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555 3140
+1354%
GT 330M 216

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+1300%
10
−1300%
Full HD32
+77.8%
18
−77.8%
4K130−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 82
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
+243%
7−8
−243%
Valorant 75−80
+182%
27−30
−182%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+618%
16−18
−618%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Dota 2 55−60
+427%
10−12
−427%
Far Cry 5 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Fortnite 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Valorant 75−80
+182%
27−30
−182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Dota 2 57
+418%
10−12
−418%
Far Cry 5 22
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 75−80
+182%
27−30
−182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Valorant 85−90
+1640%
5−6
−1640%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

This is how Pro 555 and GT 330M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 555 is 1300% faster in 900p
  • Pro 555 is 78% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 555 is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 555 surpassed GT 330M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.98 0.55
Recency 5 June 2017 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

Pro 555 has a 1350.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 555 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 330M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 126 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555 or GeForce GT 330M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.