Home > Graphics cards > Quadro M620 vs M1000M

M620 vs M1000M

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 1958$
Games supported 69%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M620
Buy
  • Interface MXM-A (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 1018
  • Max video memory 2GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 5012
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Buy
  • Interface MXM-A (3.0)
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory 2GB/4GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 706$
Games supported 70%
NVIDIA Quadro M620 NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating411397
Value for money1.372.67
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2017 (5 years ago)2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89
Price now$1958 $706 (3.5x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed1018 MHzno data
Boost clock speed977 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)30 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate31.2631.78
Floating-point performanceno data1,017 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M620 and Quadro M1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.21.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic++
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX1212
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA5.05.0

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 9.52
M1000M 9.99
+4.9%
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M620 22120
M1000M 23422
+5.9%
Quadro M620 2989
M1000M 3323
+11.2%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M620 3130
M1000M 3498
+11.7%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M620 3801
M1000M 4230
+11.3%
Quadro M620 56
M1000M 59
+5.3%
Quadro M620 56
M1000M 59
+5.5%
Quadro M620 28
M1000M 31
+11.9%
Quadro M620 20
M1000M 20
+1%
Quadro M620 28
M1000M 31
+11.9%
Quadro M620 11
M1000M 12
+10.1%
Quadro M620 25
M1000M 31
+21.4%
Quadro M620 0.6
M1000M 1.7
+183%
Quadro M620 34
+1.5%
M1000M 34
Quadro M620 32
M1000M 37
+16.5%
Quadro M620 20
M1000M 20
+1%
Quadro M620 11
M1000M 12
+10.1%

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Quadro M620 25
M1000M 31
+21.4%
Quadro M620 0.6
M1000M 1.7
+183%
Quadro M620 34
+1.5%
M1000M 34
Quadro M620 32
M1000M 37
+16.5%

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M620 2830
M1000M 2968
+4.9%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro M620 8602
+1.5%
M1000M 8471

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M620 8815
M1000M 8927
+1.3%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro M620 7859
+0.6%
M1000M 7809

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M620 and Quadro M1000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 140 Mh/s
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.22 kh/s

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−50%
39
+50%
4K10
−30%
13
+30%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−10%
11
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7
−42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 9.52 9.99
Novelty 13 January 2017 2 October 2015
Thermal design power (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M620

and

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Like
Like

Competitors of Quadro M620 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro M620 from AMD is Radeon Pro 450, which is slower by 4% and lower by 9 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M620:

AMD FirePro W7170M 111.66
AMD Radeon Pro 555 110.92
AMD Radeon Pro 455 109.98
NVIDIA Quadro M620 100
AMD Radeon Pro 450 96.22
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 93.07
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 86.76

Competitors of Quadro M1000M by AMD

The nearest Quadro M1000M's AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro 455, which is faster by 5% and higher by 12 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 455 Radeon Pro 455
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M1000M:

AMD FirePro W7170M 106.41
AMD Radeon Pro 555 105.71
AMD Radeon Pro 455 104.8
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 100
AMD Radeon Pro 450 91.69
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 88.69
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 82.68

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Quadro M1000M
vs
AMD Radeon Pro 455 Radeon Pro 455
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Quadro K4100M

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 23 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 97 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.