GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
29.91
+7%

M6000 outperforms GTX 1070 Mobile by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking191204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.5435.56
Power efficiency8.4016.36
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM200GP104B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 $389.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1070 Mobile has 905% better value for money than Quadro M6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721920
Core clock speed988 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate213.9210.6
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS6.738 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s256 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M6000 29.91
+7%
GTX 1070 Mobile 27.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M6000 11770
+7%
GTX 1070 Mobile 11000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−2%
102
+2%
1440p65−70
+4.8%
62
−4.8%
4K45−50
+0%
45
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.00
−998%
3.82
+998%
1440p64.62
−927%
6.29
+927%
4K93.33
−977%
8.67
+977%
  • GTX 1070 Mobile has 998% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile has 927% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile has 977% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 114
+0%
114
+0%
Valorant 166
+0%
166
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 113
+0%
113
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 148
+0%
148
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
+0%
92
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
+0%
108
+0%
Valorant 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 111
+0%
111
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 154
+0%
154
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 73
+0%
73
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
+0%
53
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35
+0%
35
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and GTX 1070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.91 27.95
Recency 21 March 2015 15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1070 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M6000 and GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
GRID M40 M40
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier Xavier
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
M3000 SE SE
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q 3060 Max-Q
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
HD 8760 OEM 8760 OEM
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GT 710M 710M
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB 2060 12 GB
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
RX 460 1024SP 460 1024SP
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
GT 330 OEM 330 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 152 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 864 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.