GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M4000 Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
29.45
+101%

M6000 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.47no data
Power efficiency8.4313.99
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM200GP107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed988 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate213.977.76
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs19248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+96.4%
56
−96.4%
1440p50−55
+100%
25
−100%
4K30−35
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p38.18no data
1440p84.00no data
4K140.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+0%
56
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+0%
52
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M6000 is 96% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 100% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M6000 is 76% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.45 14.66
Recency 21 March 2015 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 100.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
vs
Tesla K20Xm Tesla K20Xm
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
HD 8690M Radeon HD 8690M
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
GeForce 8400 GeForce 8400
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
R9 M375X Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
7600 GS GeForce 7600 GS
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 152 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 864 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.