Quadro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with Quadro M6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
37.42
+22.2%

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile outperforms M6000 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.54
Power efficiencyno data8.45
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGM200
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)21 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,199.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Core clock speed1556 MHz988 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1114 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data213.9
Floating-point processing powerno data6.844 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data317.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan++
CUDA+5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+23.6%
110−120
−23.6%
4K96
+28%
75−80
−28%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data38.18
4Kno data56.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+27.9%
140−150
−27.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+30%
70−75
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Valorant 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Dota 2 110−120
+24.2%
95−100
−24.2%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+27.7%
130−140
−27.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+27.9%
140−150
−27.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+24.2%
95−100
−24.2%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+30%
70−75
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 116
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 169
+30%
130−140
−30%
Valorant 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%
World of Tanks 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+27.5%
80−85
−27.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Dota 2 110−120
+24.2%
95−100
−24.2%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+27.9%
140−150
−27.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Valorant 140−150
+24.2%
120−130
−24.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
World of Tanks 230−240
+25.3%
190−200
−25.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+27.4%
95−100
−27.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Valorant 110−120
+27.8%
90−95
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Dota 2 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169
+30%
130−140
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Dota 2 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Fortnite 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Valorant 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Quadro M6000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 28% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.42 30.62
Recency 16 August 2016 21 March 2015
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro M6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3062 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 152 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.