AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro M5500
20.42
+16.1%

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M by 16% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking250287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.694.61
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date4 April 2016 (7 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$1700 $1950
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5500M has 71% better value for money than Quadro M5500.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1140 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors5200 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate149.1139.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M5500 and Radeon Pro 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6606 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5500 20.42
+16.1%
Pro 5500M 17.59

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M by 16% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M5500 7915
+16.1%
Pro 5500M 6815

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+14%
57
−14%
1440p55−60
+12.2%
49
−12.2%
4K35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−11.8%
76
+11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−21.8%
67
+21.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+14.8%
60−65
−14.8%
Hitman 3 55−60
−37.3%
81
+37.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−66.7%
55
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31.8%
58
+31.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+9.7%
62
−9.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+212%
17
−212%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−16.4%
64
+16.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+14.8%
60−65
−14.8%
Hitman 3 55−60
−8.5%
64
+8.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−12.1%
37
+12.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+17.9%
28
−17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−13.6%
50
+13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−51.1%
68
+51.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+15.3%
59
−15.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−1.9%
55
+1.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+14.8%
60−65
−14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−10%
22
+10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−4.4%
47
+4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−17.6%
40
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−5.1%
41
+5.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−17.6%
20
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−5%
21
+5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how Quadro M5500 and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro M5500 is 14% faster than Pro 5500M

1440p resolution:

  • Quadro M5500 is 12.2% faster than Pro 5500M

4K resolution:

  • Quadro M5500 is 9.4% faster than Pro 5500M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M5500 is 212% faster than the Pro 5500M.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5500M is 66.7% faster than the Quadro M5500.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is ahead in 49 tests (72%)
  • Pro 5500M is ahead in 19 tests (28%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.42 17.59
Recency 4 April 2016 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro M5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 34 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 242 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.